The Socioeconomic Impact of Terminal Cancer on Patients' Families and Its Associated Factors

BACKGROUND: We conducted this study to investigate the financial burden of terminal cancer patient's family and to identify factors influencing their economic burden. METHODS: We approached 187 family members supporting their famly member with terminal cancer who was enrolled in four hospice and palliative care program. We constructed a questionnaire examining the impact of illness on their family. With multiple logistic analysis, we examined the patients' and family members' demographic and the patients' clinical factors associated with the burden caused by terminal cancer. RESULTS: The majority of families reported the loss of savings (54%), the need to make major life changes in order to care for the patient (50%), the loss of incomes (34%), the inability to function normally because of the stress of the illness (27%). Many families had to move to a less expensive home (18%), delay medical care for other family members (12%), or change educational plans for other family members (13%). Families that cared for patients who wanted to be cared for at institution (odds ratio: 2.72, 95% confidential interval: 1.19~6.19), patients with liver cancer (3.61, 1.53~8.57), and families who were poor caregivers (2.97, 1.24~7.10), or primary caregiver was a spouse (3.57, 1.47~8.68) were more likely to lose savings. Families that were in 'new couple' in family life cycle stages (3.91, 1.04~14.63), 'birth of the first child' (8.34, 2.74~25.32), and 'the adolescent family or the launching family' (10.56, 4.07~27.33), were more likely to lose savings than 'the empty family or the aging family'. CONCLUSION: Many families reported severe caregiving and economic burdens. Social and financial support need to be given to families with predictors of high economic burdens.

Clinical considerations about terminally ill cancer patients who died in hospice unit / 대한내과학회지

BACKGROUND: Although physicians state that patients ideally should receive hospice palliative care for 3 months before death, the majority of patients survive less than one month in hospice palliative care. This is too short to do effective hospice palliative care. Therefore, we figured out the problems through the clinical considerations about terminally ill cancer patients who had died in hospice unit. METHODS: From July to December in 2003, 107 patients with terminally ill cancer who had died in Sam Anyang Hospice Unit were enrolled in this study. For getting the informations about patients characteristics, we reviewed the medical records and interviewed the patients on the first visit. RESULTS: There were 70 males (65%) and 37 females (35%), and median age of patients was 60 years (range 23-93). The most common cancer was stomach cancer (18 patients, 17%). Forty seven patients (44%) took analgesics, the others 60 (56%) not. The most common symptom was pain (75 patients, 70%) and the most prevalent reason for admission was also pain (60, 56%). The most prevalent physician specialty who transferred patients or referred to local hospital was other internal medicine (48 patients, 44%), followed by hemato-oncology (38, 36%), surgery (12, 11%) and others (9, 9%). The median duration between the day when the patients were diagnosed as terminally ill cancer patient and the day when they were referred to hospice center is 48 days. The median survival in hospice palliative care is 30 days. The median hospitalization is 19 days. CONCLUSION: We found that lack of recognition about hospice palliative care of physicians, patients and families made the length of hospice palliative care too short. To do effective hospice palliative care, it needs education and promotion for them constantly.

The comparison of the medical costs and quality of life in terminal cancer patients by the types of medical facilities

BACKGROUND: Life expectancy is ever increasing due to medical advancements, but cancer death rate is also increased. Quality of life is an important issue in cancer patients. Despite developments of early diagnosis and treatments for cancer, the medical costs is increasing due to exfended sarvival against cancer and the absolute numbers of terminal cancer patients. We assessed the medical costs and quality of life in terminal cancer patients by the types of medical facilities, which would contribute to effective management. METHOD: A total 159 patients(males 70, females 89) with terminal cancer patients who were treated and died in various types of medical facilities(home hospice, charity hospital hospice unit, university hospital hospice unit, university hospital non-hospice unit) between November 1, 1997 and January 31, 1999 were included in the study. After the confirmation that the demographic factors correlated with factors of quality of life, the differences in the medical costs and quality of life(pain, depression, ADLs, family APGAR score) during the last 1 week of life in the various types of medical facilities analyzed by multi-way ANOVA with interaction of the significant demographic factors. RESULTS: The mean cost of types of medical facilities during the last week of patients as 65332.5 won in charity hospital hospice unit, 105165.5 won in home hospice, 702083.4 won in university hospital hospice unit, and 1037358.6 won in university hospital non-hospice unit. The difference between free hospital hospice unit and home hospice in medical costs as not statistically significant, but the difference among charity hospital hospice unit and home hospice, university hospital hospice unit, and university hospital non-hospice unit as significant (p<0.001). The demographical factors of quality of life in terms of pain, depression, ADLs, and family APGAR score were compared among various facilities. The ADL score of home hospice was 8.2 +/- 3.3, which was lower than free hospital hospice unit and university hospital hospice unit(p<0.05). The mean pain scor of home hospice as 1.7+/-1.7 and that of university hospital hospice as 1.2+/-1.2, and pain scores of home hospice were lower than free hospital hospice unit, and pain scores of university hospital hospice were lower than free hospital hospice unit and university hospital non-hospice unit(p<0.05). In depression's categorial scale of home hospice the score was 4.8+/-1.3, which was higher than those of free hospital hospice unit and university hospital non-hospice unit(p<0.05), signifying less depression. The family APGAR score was statistically insignificant among various types of medical facilities. CONCLUSION: The cost of hospice care is less than the non-hospice care. We found that the patients of home hospice experienced less pain and depression even with low ADLs, and increased the quality of life in both psychological and physical aspects.